The online community and resource center for all in life science related disciplines (BIOSCIENTISTS)
February 21, 2020, 08:34:49 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Over 3000 Nigerian Life scientists are on ground & willing to provide answers to your bioscience & research questions/problems; You only need to post it online Now! (Requires very brief registration)

To be kept up to date on interesting posts in this forum,  LIKE our facebook page!
.
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: High trusters were better lie detectors than were low trusters - (Aug, 2010)  (Read 2847 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Francis Umeoguaju
Administrator
Expert in Bioscience Issues
*****
Posts: 657



WWW
« on: August 23, 2010, 04:58:42 pm »


High trusters were better lie detectors than were low trusters - (Aug, 2010 bioscience headlines)

Trusting others may not make you necessarily a fool or a Pollyanna, according to a study in the current Social Psychological and Personality Science (published by SAGE). Instead it can be a sign that you're smart.

Researchers asked study participants to watch taped job interviews of 2nd year MBA students. Interviewees were all told to do their best to get the job. Half of the interviewees were completely truthful; the other half told at least three significant lies to appear more attractive for the job. All interviewees were guaranteed $20 for making the job interview tape, and both the liars and truth-tellers hoped to receive an additional $20 if a supposed "lie detection expert" watched the tape and believed they were telling the truth.

Several days before the participants watched the tapes, they filled out a questionnaire that measured their trust in other people, with questions such as "Most people are basically honest," and "Most people are basically good-natured and kind." They then watched the videos, and rated the truthfulness and honesty of the interviewees.

People high in trust were more accurate at detecting the liars -- the more people showed trust in others, the more able they were to distinguish a lie from the truth. The more faith in their fellow humans they had, the more they wanted to hire the honest interviewees and to avoid the lying ones. Contrary to the stereotype, people who were low in trust were more willing to hire liars and they were also less likely to be aware that they were liars.Read more? >>
Sourced from <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/08/100813090457.htm>


Feel free to post your comments about this story here. Free and brief registration into our bioscience community is required before you can post your comments.


You can also access other interesting & Recent bioscience stories here.

Click here, to subscribe for our monthly free enewletters


You can also suggest new stories here



Logged

Chances favours the trained minds
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
SMFAds for Free Forums
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!